4 ms·
As much as this is refreshing, Sublime just works though. Even Sublime 2 wasn't that bad you'd want Sublime 3. For heavy projects I use IntelliJ. I was happy t
by keyle 10y ago
As much as this is refreshing, Sublime just works though.
Even Sublime 2 wasn't that bad you'd want Sublime 3. For heavy projects I use IntelliJ. I was happy to pay for Sublime. I remember switching from Textmate to Sublime because it had compelling arguments.
Sublime is the perfect editor between Notepad and IntelliJ. Anyway I hope this is just as good.
- themodelplumber 10y agoDo any of these text editors you mention include a screensaver? I was just trying BREEZE for MS-DOS today and found that feature really appealing. I came back to my desk and the entire UI had just vanished and turned into a field of twinkling stars. I would love it if one of my more modern text editors did that.
- jaccarmac 10y agoM-x zone
- flukus 10y agoDoes anyone use desktop screen savers anymore? It used to be amazing how much customization some people put into to something that only appeared when they weren't using it. More apps need boss mode though.
- falcolas 10y agoI do, to lock my mac on demand. I think there's another way to do it now, but I'm stuck in old habits.
- tincholio 10y agoOf course, Emacs has zone-mode
- steveklabnik 10y agoWhat are your thoughts on VS: Code?
- tf2manu994 10y agoNot great with large files.
- Cyph0n 10y agoStill way better than Atom though. VS Code's biggest weakness is the poor selection of third-party plugins. That's primarily why I'm still using Atom.
- keyle 10y agoVS Code is great. But if I start using VS Code, it's because I want more than Sublime, and so I end up just doing it in IntelliJ because, to me, it's the best there is.