I loathe that sort of thing, but in this case I think we lucked out, because "serverless" is a particularly bad name for that style of architecture. Take this

I loathe that sort of thing, but in this case I think we lucked out, because "serverless" is a particularly bad name for that style of architecture. Take this as an opportunity to call it "cloud functions" or "functions as a service" or something more accurate/descriptive.