3 ms·

You must not have listened very closely. As noted below in the transcript, they confirmed the U5 form. Also she started in 2007 and it was noted she worked ther

by Klinky 10y ago

You must not have listened very closely. As noted below in the transcript, they confirmed the U5 form. Also she started in 2007 and it was noted she worked there for 5 years, i.e. fired around 2012 before shit hit the fan. Her story is actually rather common for honest employees working at Wells Fargo, which is why they are going to get sued by many for wrongful termination. Management mismanaged employees and created a culture of fraud. They profited heavily from it. If anything, they are the most responsible for creating the shitty culture. Why let them off the hook? They get larger salaries, while deflecting the responsibilities that come with the decisions they made to pressure employees into fraudulent activity while firing those that reported it? That's quite insane.

forgetsusername 10y ago
>they confirmed the U5 form Not a "blacklist", and not unexpected when you're canned from a finance job. As far as WF is concerned, she committed fraud, so they filed a U5. Would you rather they not? It will be investigated; if it's unfounded she can sue. >Her story is actually rather common for honest employees working at Wells Fargo Yes, there are honest employees caught up in this. There are also many dishonest ones. >If anything, they are the most responsible for creating the shitty culture Really? More responsible than the people who commit the act? That is ridiculous. Have some personal accountability. If my employer asked me to do some fraudulent, I would refuse. I certainly wouldn't rip people off, then complain that I was "told to".
- st3v3r 10y ago
  No, as far as WF is concerned, she REFUSED TO COMMIT FRAUD, and so that's why she was fired. And because she refused to go along, she was blacklisted. "Really? More responsible than the people who commit the act?" Absofuckinglutely. If you are in a position of power over someone, and you tell them to commit fraud or they are fired, then YOU are culpable. "If my employer asked me to do some fraudulent, I would refuse." I'm glad you can afford to do so. "I certainly wouldn't rip people off, then complain that I was "told to"." I'm glad you can afford that moral high horse, too.

by Klinky 10y ago

forgetsusername 10y ago

>they confirmed the U5 form Not a "blacklist", and not unexpected when you're canned from a finance job. As far as WF is concerned, she committed fraud, so they filed a U5. Would you rather they not? It will be investigated; if it's unfounded she can sue. >Her story is actually rather common for honest employees working at Wells Fargo Yes, there are honest employees caught up in this. There are also many dishonest ones. >If anything, they are the most responsible for creating the shitty culture Really? More responsible than the people who commit the act? That is ridiculous. Have some personal accountability. If my employer asked me to do some fraudulent, I would refuse. I certainly wouldn't rip people off, then complain that I was "told to".

st3v3r 10y ago
No, as far as WF is concerned, she REFUSED TO COMMIT FRAUD, and so that's why she was fired. And because she refused to go along, she was blacklisted. "Really? More responsible than the people who commit the act?" Absofuckinglutely. If you are in a position of power over someone, and you tell them to commit fraud or they are fired, then YOU are culpable. "If my employer asked me to do some fraudulent, I would refuse." I'm glad you can afford to do so. "I certainly wouldn't rip people off, then complain that I was "told to"." I'm glad you can afford that moral high horse, too.