4 ms·
This is a great article, but it would be good to state up-front that the author works for a company that sells a service designed to help you go on-prem. It's n
by dantiberian 10y ago
This is a great article, but it would be good to state up-front that the author works for a company that sells a service designed to help you go on-prem. It's not totally clear until later in the article that this is the case. It would also help put the article in context better.
- bluetwo 10y agoYep. I have to agree with this comment. My first thought was about some advice I would give someone considering this (having been pushed into this situation by a large healthcare client years back). But once I found it was a sales piece, that thought faded.
- MattRogish 10y agoAnother company that does this - very little marketing - is https://www.replicated.com https://www.replicated.com . I don't get paid for recommending them but they do great work (some of our clients are theirs etc).
- nraynaud 10y agoI'm doing a contract for one of their clients, it's quite a challenge to develop against that.
- BenjaminCoe 10y agoWe've had the opposite experience using Replicated for npm's on-prem npm Enterprise software. I was originally trying to build our Enterprise solution using Ansible, targeting a few common OSes (Ubuntu, Centos, RHEL); headaches gradually began to pile up, surrounding the "tiny" differences in each of these environments -- I'm VERY happy to offload this work. It took me a little while to wrap my head around best practices regarding placing our services in Docker containers, but once I was over this conceptual leap I was quite happy.
- kordless 10y agoSandstorm.io is another. FWIW, we've been talking about these types of startups coming for a few years now. It's probably a few years out, but on-prem (or what I call the Intercloud) is definitely going to be bigger than anything we've seen yet.
- twakefield 10y agoI'm the OP and author. I figured that because it's on the company blog with an about us that says what we do this was properly disclosed. But maybe it could use an additional lead in.
- dantiberian 10y agoAh, I see now. I read the article on mobile, and it didn't show the sidebar there.
- twakefield 10y agoAh, yes. I forgot we hide the sidebar for mobile. Will take this into account in the future.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]