i fail to see how SSRS is generic, its not a trivial product, and if you standardize on it to create your enterprise report, you wouldnt wonna change it same g

i fail to see how SSRS is generic, its not a trivial product, and if you standardize on it to create your enterprise report, you wouldnt wonna change it same goes for sql server 2005, very complex beast okay so maybe you mean, the hosting service, not the ssrs as a serice as i first thought, well, its only a licensing thing, MS will charge other who host ssrs webservices or sql services more then it charge the user clients, it will make money from both, those who use the service and those who provide it and the thing about good or bad market, isnt really an issue, i think this model is an improvement, which mean companies will go for it anyway, its really a matter of time, and yes it may mean and should mean less money for MS, but i think less money is better than no money at all and well, one topic lead to another, capitalism and growth etc ... growth is a complex issue, the problem with increasing a company revenue period after period, is that it focus on revenue and profit growth, while growth in economics is more about welfare, with doesnt directly translate to more money, so in a way, in the future we will be richer/grower but have less cash! And MS will increase welfare, but reduce its revenues!