3 ms·
the fundamental problem seems to be tying public school funding to taxes at a very local level. i was surprised when i found out that was the system in america;
by zem 10y ago
the fundamental problem seems to be tying public school funding to taxes at a very local level. i was surprised when i found out that was the system in america; it seems like a very blatant rich-get-richer measure.
- ghaff 10y agoYou're assuming that this results in upscale cities and towns having better outcomes by spending more per pupil. In fact, yes, the outcomes tend to be better; the schools are often better by both objective and subjective measures. But the correlation with spending is very murky. "Bad" urban schools with often poor student outcomes often have significantly higher spending per pupil than the tony suburban schools. There are lots of reasons why this would be the case of course. But it's not exclusively, or even primarily, a matter of relative spending levels.
- whybroke 10y agoNot only that but you will find some people in the US go though ridiculous mental gymnastics to claim that money makes no difference to education. While at the same to they put huge effort into moving into a neighbor with high spending on schools. It is not enough to defend privileged with taxation, institutions and laws but they must use astounding double-think to convince themselves that the result is somehow fair. Part of that self-indoctrination is putting huge effort into convincing everyone around them of these absurd views.