5 ms·

The text detection is lacking in comparison to Google's Vision API. Here is a real-life comparison between Tesseract and Google's Vision API, based on a PDF a u

• bijection 10y ago
  Although Google's API is certainly better, Tesseract.js should work similarly if you increase the font size. Screenshots taken on 'retina' devices are around the smallest text it can handle well. Edit: A screenshot of the same text at a higher resolution: https://imgur.com/a/W7IGu https://imgur.com/a/W7IGu Tesseract.js output: https://imgur.com/a/niIfM https://imgur.com/a/niIfM "I am also a top professional on thumbtack which is a site for people looking for professional services like on gig salad. Please see my reviews from my clients there as well"
  • jaytaylor 10y ago
    Your comment (zoomed in Chrome on Win 10): http://i.imgur.com/uuFhw90.png http://i.imgur.com/uuFhw90.png Tesseract.js analysis: Although Googie's API is certaihiy better, Tesseract.js should work simiiarly if you increase the font size. Screenshots taken on 'retiha’ devices are around the smailest text it can handie well. Edit: A screenshot of the same text at a higher resolution: httgs:[[imgurxomZaN/UGu Tesseract.js output: httgs://imguricom[a[hiIfM This is a neat toy, but not impressive compared to the results from tesseract-ocr/tesseract [0]: $ curl -s http://i.imgur.com/uuFhw90.png \ | tesseract stdin stdout Although Google's API is certainly better, Tesseract.js should work similarly if you increase the font size. Screenshots taken on 'retina' devices are around the smallest text it can handle well. Edit: A screenshot of the same text at a higher resolution: https:[ZimguncomlalWHGu Tesseract.js output: https:[[imgur.com[a[nilfM Notice how Tesseract.js results suffer from being unable to differentiate between n's and h's, i's and l's. [0] https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
    • bijection 10y ago
      That's interesting! Given that Tesseract.js wraps an Emscripten'd copy of Tesseract, I would have expected close to identical performance. This might have to do with the way we threshold images, with the age of the tesseract version we're using, or both. I'll look into it! Edit: In addition to those differences, I think your font size is still a bit too small. On an unedited screenshot from a macbook (https://i.imgur.com/iv4ZdSt.png https://i.imgur.com/iv4ZdSt.png) I get Although Google's API is certainly better, Tesseract.js should work similarly if you increase the font size. Screenshots taken on 'retina' devices are around the smallest text it can handle well. Edit: A screenshot of the same text at a higher resolution: https:[[imgur.com[a[W7IGu Tesseract.js output: https:[[imgur.com[a[niIfM “I am also a top professional on thumbtack which is a site for people looking for professional services like on gig salad. Please see my reviews from my clients there as well"
      • jaytaylor 10y ago
        What do you mean by "emscripten'd"? Is Tesseract.js using emscripten to effectively bundle the 150KLOC of C/C++ from tesseract-ocr and the upstream dependency on leptonica [0]? If so, that's amazing! > This might have to do with the way we threshold images, > with the age of the tesseract version we're using, or > both. I'll look into it! I'd be very interested to hear about what is required to make it "match" native functionality. Please do drop me a line if/when you get it figured out! (I'm @jtaylor on twitter [1]) [0] http://www.leptonica.org/ http://www.leptonica.org/ [1] https://twitter.com/jtaylor https://twitter.com/jtaylor
        • mumphster 10y ago
          Here's the repo of their build process for the core tesseract emscripten build https://github.com/naptha/tesseract-emscripten/blob/master/javascript/Makefile#L4 https://github.com/naptha/tesseract-emscripten/blob/master/j... specifically the line for lepton
    • brazzledazzle 10y ago
      Hey just a reminder that this is a ShowHN which has its own rules. Honesty is okay but aim to be respectful.
  • oriolid 10y ago
    I've used Tesseract for a production OCR project some years ago, and can confirm too that it just doesn't work at screen resolution. On the other hand, performance on high DPI photos was quite OK. Google Vision API wasn't around at that time so I can't compare.
• deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
• ajacksified 10y ago
  I spent many afternoons trying to get tesseract to read Dwarf Fortress screenshots, such as http://i.imgur.com/32vVhnH.png http://i.imgur.com/32vVhnH.png - including much pre-processing, such as converting the text to black and white. Alas, I never even got close. Edit: just tried Google's, and it had one mistake for that entire file. That's pretty impressive.
  • bijection 10y ago
    Upscaling worked ok for me: Upscaled image: https://imgur.com/a/4IQA7 https://imgur.com/a/4IQA7 Result on demo page: http://imgur.com/a/A0v5C http://imgur.com/a/A0v5C The hammerman Tikes flsosushsath: Greetings. My name is Tikes Leafsilk. You: Rh. hello. I'm Stasbo Murderknower the Craterous Trance of Fins. Don't travel alone at night. or the bogeyman will get you. You: Tell me about this hall. Tikes: This is The flccidental Ualley. In 123, Stasho Steamdances ruled from The flccidental Ualley of The Council of Cobras in Ueilapes. ...
    • xigency 10y ago
      This seems like a font issue. Would training the model for this console font help?
    • deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
  • jackhack 10y ago
    Since we're trading "I failed" stories... I spent a weekend tying Tesseract together with Tekkotsu (the amazing open framework for the Sony AIBO) in an attempt to teach my robot dog to read. The eventual goal being to hook up the output of OCR --> Text To Speech (TTS) and have him read to me. Alas, the low resolution of the camera was an insurmountable problem. Poor Aibo needed 40-point fonts and I practically had to rub his nose in the book. Not exactly the user experience I was aiming for. Never got around to the TTS part.
    • Accacin 10y ago
• driverdan 10y ago
  We spent a decent amount of time evaluating Abbyy vs Tesseract vs Cloud Vision. Cloud Vision wins hands down and is very reasonably priced.
  • emmelaich 10y ago
    There is a Chrome Extension for Cloud Vision which works well and seems to be free. Written by a Google employee, see top link at http://www.imjasonh.com/projects http://www.imjasonh.com/projects
• doctorcroc 10y ago
  Google Cloud Vision API is very expensive though -- if you can sacrifice some amount of quality, it might make sense to go with the open source alternative. At $2.50/unit the cost is absurd, and even the free trial expires after 90 days.
  • Huppie 10y ago
    I just checked because I couldn't believe that price. "Price per 1000 units. Unit volumes are based on monthly usage." It's $2.50 per 1000 units, so 0.25 cents per unit. Edit: And, according to the pricing page [1] the first 1000 units are free. [1]: https://cloud.google.com/vision/pricing https://cloud.google.com/vision/pricing
    • noteone 10y ago
      This is the correct pricing. One caveat: Even the free tier requires you to enter a credit card. For higher volumes, there is also the OCR.space api. It offers 25,000 free conversions per month. It is not as good as Google, but works fine on screenshots.
    • doctorcroc 10y ago
      My mistake -- thanks for pointing that out. I think I was in shock, and didn't take a closer look.
    • ben174 10y ago
      Note that's $0.0025 per unit, not 25 cents per unit. Your post is correct, but, ya know, Verizon math is a real thing.
• Omnipresent 10y ago
  How do you test sample images with google's vision api? Do you have to sign up for a 90 day trial or do they allow you to upload images for trial.