3 ms·

Have some examples? The MIT license is problematic with software patents. I see some projects moving to Apache2 for that reason (one prominent example here is

Have some examples? The MIT license is problematic with software patents. I see some projects moving to Apache2 for that reason (one prominent example here is Rust. They moved to an MIT/Apache2 dual licensing model).

jsprogrammer 10y ago
What is the problem with the MIT license and patents? The MIT license grants explicit rights to deal in the software without restriction.
- tracker1 10y ago
  A copyright license is not necessarily the same as a patent grant... Apache 2 does contain a patent grant, and an even bigger nuclear deterrent similar to Facebook's separate grant with MIT.
  - jsprogrammer 10y ago
    The MIT license is not a copyright license (though, copyright is claimed). It is a license for unrestricted dealings in the software subject to certain conditions (no warranty or fitness, appropriate notices given, etc.).
webwalker 10y ago
Here are some that I found that are all created in that window: - https://github.com/Microsoft/Docker-PowerShell https://github.com/Microsoft/Docker-PowerShell - https://github.com/Microsoft/malmo https://github.com/Microsoft/malmo - https://github.com/Microsoft/projection-grid https://github.com/Microsoft/projection-grid - https://github.com/Microsoft/HoloToolkit-Unity https://github.com/Microsoft/HoloToolkit-Unity - https://github.com/Microsoft/pxt https://github.com/Microsoft/pxt - https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder - https://github.com/Microsoft/elfie-arriba https://github.com/Microsoft/elfie-arriba - https://github.com/Microsoft/team-explorer-everywhere https://github.com/Microsoft/team-explorer-everywhere I could have found more, but its a big org. Any examples I found that used other licenses where that way because they where related to something else that used a previous license (i.e. all TypeScript stuff is Apache2, hence any new TS is still be Apache2 for consistency).

jsprogrammer 10y ago

What is the problem with the MIT license and patents? The MIT license grants explicit rights to deal in the software without restriction.

tracker1 10y ago
A copyright license is not necessarily the same as a patent grant... Apache 2 does contain a patent grant, and an even bigger nuclear deterrent similar to Facebook's separate grant with MIT.
- jsprogrammer 10y ago
  The MIT license is not a copyright license (though, copyright is claimed). It is a license for unrestricted dealings in the software subject to certain conditions (no warranty or fitness, appropriate notices given, etc.).

webwalker 10y ago

Here are some that I found that are all created in that window: - https://github.com/Microsoft/Docker-PowerShell https://github.com/Microsoft/Docker-PowerShell - https://github.com/Microsoft/malmo https://github.com/Microsoft/malmo - https://github.com/Microsoft/projection-grid https://github.com/Microsoft/projection-grid - https://github.com/Microsoft/HoloToolkit-Unity https://github.com/Microsoft/HoloToolkit-Unity - https://github.com/Microsoft/pxt https://github.com/Microsoft/pxt - https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder - https://github.com/Microsoft/elfie-arriba https://github.com/Microsoft/elfie-arriba - https://github.com/Microsoft/team-explorer-everywhere https://github.com/Microsoft/team-explorer-everywhere I could have found more, but its a big org. Any examples I found that used other licenses where that way because they where related to something else that used a previous license (i.e. all TypeScript stuff is Apache2, hence any new TS is still be Apache2 for consistency).