3 ms·
HTTPS and full contrast text are important. The 2nd attempt is a downgrade from the first. This 3rd attempt is an actual improvement.
by mrob 10y ago
HTTPS and full contrast text are important. The 2nd attempt is a downgrade from the first. This 3rd attempt is an actual improvement.
- egypturnash 10y agoThe second one is the only one that puts any effort into actual legibility. There's a nice comfortable amount of space between the lines! The text doesn't render right at the edge of the page! There are MARGINS and WHITESPACE. If you just take your browser's defaults for all the typographical stuff like that, everything looks like trash.
- Iv 10y agoHonestly, I can't stand websites that decide to waste 70% of screen estate. I can see the first site almost without scrolling. It is 2 to 3 pages on the other iterations. The only things I may agree with is https and zipping. "Fits on all your shitty screens" Does mean that it FITS ON ALL YOUR SHITTY SCREENS. Mine is a 1920x1080 (which is the minimal nowadays) and the 2nd and third iterations DO NOT FIT IT. That thing around the web page, it is called a fucking window. It resizes. I'll do that if I want your fucking column-format.