3 ms·
I don't think he said anything about absolutely needing to charge customers directly? "They make a product or offer a service and their customers pay them for
by apsurd 17y ago
I don't think he said anything about absolutely needing to charge customers directly?
"They make a product or offer a service and their customers pay them for it."
In all your scenarios, there is an entity that is paying the company for a product or service rendered. They may not be a simple definition of the word "customer" but they are a customer none-the-less.
I think the issue is more about smart business. No one is going to knock ning (and there would be no reason for their new strategy) if they figured out how to make money on their freemium model. But they didn't! And that's not good business.
Obligatory google example: It's free. Yay, search all you want. Google's customers are the advertisers that pay for ad positioning. Yes the users are the customers too, but that does not mean that the advertisers aren't.
- axod 17y agoThe issue with ning was they took a stupid amount of investment IMHO. If they hadn't they'd be profitable. 'Ad revenue' > 'Cost of serving a few dumb HTTP requests' => profit. That equation is simple, and holds pretty well. If you're spending more money serving HTTP requests than you can make from advertising, you're doing it wrong.