4 ms·
The Window Manager and opening/closing/dragging/resizing effects were really impressive for 1993. Way more than Mac at the time, or even Linux 3-4 years later.
by zhte415 10y ago
The Window Manager and opening/closing/dragging/resizing effects were really impressive for 1993. Way more than Mac at the time, or even Linux 3-4 years later.
- jlebrech 10y agoit's a shame it's fiction
- zhte415 10y agoSeems to have no OLE support, so pretty authentic in my book, as that only came later. Surprised the ancient computer isn't dying under the strain of so many visits.
- itomato 10y agoIt's not a computer. It's not a Windows release. It's not even old. It's a recent site that mimics (satrizes) some of the behaviors of Windows 95.
- zhte415 10y ago> It's not a computer. It's not a Windows release. It's not even old. Win93 seems pretty olds to me. > It's a recent site that mimics (satrizes) some of the behaviors of Windows 95. How can this mimic or satitise Windows 95? I understand a less complex system can simulate a more complex system, but only slower, or maybe, but _2 years_ between releases with superior Wm functionality degraded??? It doesn't even have Winsock, and that was done in 1992!
- khedoros1 10y agoYour comments are less funny than you think they are.
- cot6mur3 10y agoTo be fair, though, this webapp emulates the look & feel of Windows 95 (or greater), which was released in August 1995. Windows 3.1(1) (and NT 3.1 as of July 1993) were the current versions of Windows in 1993; each had far less polished effects: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x for screenshot. :)