> No because they didn't lose. Perhaps not legally (and so, yes, they probably won't be made to pay). But I think publicly they have lost on this. If the aim

> No because they didn't lose. Perhaps not legally (and so, yes, they probably won't be made to pay). But I think publicly they have lost on this. If the aim was to ruin his reputation that doesn't seem to have worked and neither has trying to ruin him financially. I would say Singh has won in every sense of the word but a legal ruling :)