3 ms·
No. You are peers. Both are businesses doing business. They have a business relationship. > They literally won't even talk to you. And exactly this is, why th
by sdoering 10y ago
No. You are peers. Both are businesses doing business. They have a business relationship.
> They literally won't even talk to you.
And exactly this is, why the system is broken. If you are the elephant in the room and you do not have to care for the flies even if there would be regulations protecting the flies then this is not a good situation.
This would be some kind of Feudalism. At least in practice.
To clarify: I know there exists rules and regulations. But if a big player like FB can just ignore them unless someone unleashes their lawyers, esp. if this other person is sitting half the globe away, then something is very, very broken and fucked up.
- legulere 10y agoBeing peers is often set as an axiom or a prerequisite when thinking about the theory of business transactions. However often in the reality it isn't the case. This is why you need antitrust laws, consumer protection laws, regulation, unions, etc. The problem here is that there is a hole in the system. Not being paid or being paid late is very common for smaller contractors in several industries.
- st3v3r 10y agoUnless you're Oracle, Google, Apple, or Microsoft, you are not a peer with Facebook. "To clarify: I know there exists rules and regulations. But if a big player like FB can just ignore them unless someone unleashes their lawyers, esp. if this other person is sitting half the globe away, then something is very, very broken and fucked up." You're not wrong, but how would you cause Facebook to care? And you can't really say government, because that would require government to be looking over every single transaction. Ignoring the privacy/freedom aspects, that would take a huge amount of manpower that the government just doesn't have and isn't willing to fund.