The article was interesting and provided some information (on the battery suppliers, not being able to reproduce the problem) and perspective that I wasn't awar

The article was interesting and provided some information (on the battery suppliers, not being able to reproduce the problem) and perspective that I wasn't aware of before. But the headline seemed inaccurate though. I read this article twice, and I still finished with the feeling that it didn't really answer the question in the headline. None of the interviews with identified or unidentified sources answered this particular question with any details. So it's a management decision because even the replacement phones had the same issue. Anybody following the news could've guessed that.