48 ms·
The site makes no claims as such, but it undermines its own credibility if it uses .js files. Surely they could have figured a way to do without them.
by dcw303 10y ago
The site makes no claims as such, but it undermines its own credibility if it uses .js files.
Surely they could have figured a way to do without them.
- Insanity 10y agoAt the start of the article they do state that you might need javascript. The point was to show off things you can do without javascript, not say that you never need it.
- userbinator 10y agoIndeed, a bit funny for a site titled "You Might Not Need JavaScript" to itself use JS.
- dontbethatguy 10y agodid you accidentally go to site called youshouldneveruseJS.com? Because I think we were talking about you-MIGHT-not-need-JS.
- crashdown 10y agoOf course it doesn't undermine it's own credibility. If you turn off JS you'll see that the site still works. It's progressively enhanced using JS to give you examples of what is shown here.