3 ms·
"There is just nothing to select for longer lifespans beyond the time it takes to reproduce." Definitely there is. If humans spent a long time learning, and we
by jomamaxx 10y ago
"There is just nothing to select for longer lifespans beyond the time it takes to reproduce."
Definitely there is. If humans spent a long time learning, and were more productive and fruitful in their later years, developing more intelligent systems, they would theoretically out-compete a civilization that wasn't able to develop such advanced skills and learning - especially related to passing on information.
The missing issue not obvious in genes is the amount of cultural information and learning passed on. A genetically 'superior' race of beings (faster, smarter, more disease resistant) would surely be 'beaten' by a group of lesser beings who were able to cooperate, learn, cognize, master tools, pass on wisdom etc...
- rubberstamp 10y agoThis is the same conclusion I came to as well thinking about stuff. There are a lot of genes that we don't know what it does. Unless evolutionary feature development is throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks, there definitely is information (not just physical description of how features should be and how it should function, but many valuable data as well) passing from parents to siblings via genes. I came across two some orphaned puppies. They grew up and knew how to do certain stuff and I didn't see anyone teaching them those stuff.