Thanks for the explanation. I try to steer clear of the law, as the only thing that I do know is that the law doesn't have to make intuitive sense to non-lawyer

Thanks for the explanation. I try to steer clear of the law, as the only thing that I do know is that the law doesn't have to make intuitive sense to non-lawyers. But in this particular situation, that sort of due diligence makes sense. If you'll forgive me for a horribly mixed metaphor, this seems like a hail mary pass late in the fourth quarter. I don't think Gawker has much of a chance in any other way, so they're just throwing stuff against the wall to see what sticks.