3 ms·
| They are not remotely comparable Oh dear, there seems to be an epidemic of people's comparators not working. You might want to start small: try comparing tw
by winston_smith 10y ago
| They are not remotely comparable
Oh dear, there seems to be an epidemic of people's comparators not working. You might want to start small: try comparing two oranges, then an orange and an apple. Before long you'll be comparing supernovas to salamanders!
(Or perhaps you meant the rather less categorical "I think they're very different". I harp on this because I find "not remotely comparable" excessively dismissive. It's fine to disagree, just don't act like there's no possible way the other person might have a valid point)
- gnaritas 10y agoOh dear, I don't care what you like to harp on, take your sarcasm and shove it.