4 ms·
Me, too. And "driverless cars," also. There is a driver! It's just in software! The car's still got something driving it. It's just not a person! People tell
by moduspwnens14 10y ago
Me, too. And "driverless cars," also.
There is a driver! It's just in software! The car's still got something driving it. It's just not a person!
People tell me, "Dude, that's pedantic. Clearly what people mean when they say 'driverless cars' isn't that there's literally nothing driving it. They mean that having people driving cars has a lot of downsides and having the benefits of cars available without having an in-person driver opens up a lot of opportunities and frees us from personally having to drive ourselves."
I hate it when they tell me that.
- partycoder 10y agoAutonomous car could be a better term.
- moduspwnens14 10y agoYou're right. There is a clear and accurate alternative in this case. What about for a serverless architecture?