3 ms·
You keep claiming it's not ambiguous and that nothing is undefined. I've explained repeatedly how the statement can be interpreted such that an empty set is und
by eridius 10y ago
You keep claiming it's not ambiguous and that nothing is undefined. I've explained repeatedly how the statement can be interpreted such that an empty set is undefined behavior, but you refuse to even acknowledge that this is a potential interpretation of the spec. Yes, the spec should be unambiguous, but that doesn't mean it actually is.
- lmm 10y ago> I've explained repeatedly how the statement can be interpreted such that an empty set is undefined behavior No you haven't. Not at all. Not unless you're claiming the word "any" means something different from what it means.
- eridius 10y agoYes I have. The fact that you seem incapable of understanding this explanation does not mean that I haven't explained it. So please, stop pretending that your viewpoint is the only one that's valid and just accept that there are people who can interpret the wording in a way that you cannot seem to understand.
- lmm 10y agoYou haven't given an explanation. This isn't a question of "viewpoint" or "interpretation". The words simply don't mean what you're trying to claim they do.