> On the other hand, in a workplace situation, the defensive ones are simply not thinking tactically. Haha absolutely true. It puzzles me that anyone would rea

> On the other hand, in a workplace situation, the defensive ones are simply not thinking tactically. Haha absolutely true. It puzzles me that anyone would react that way. Your points are totally valid. For me, the interesting part was reading my own results and thinking about my reaction to them, and watching people I know pretty well reading and reacting to theirs. Also, the way the results are framed teases apart some of the more "identity-oriented" aspects of peoples' personalities and validates them as legitimate rather than (perhaps) annoying quirks. I think this can lead to empathy. So I don't really think it matters how psychologically real the assessment is, so long as it's interesting, relatively repeatable, and useful in the sense I mentioned. Just my opinion though. In the workplace I've used it before alongside a few other metrics (like DISC and one other private one) as part of a fun "learn about each other" exercise. I would not use it for hiring decisions or as part of any kind of official HR oriented policy.