Two important points. >It's not like Apple does this kind of thing every day 1. Just because you don't hear about it doesn't mean it doesn't happen all the ti

Two important points. >It's not like Apple does this kind of thing every day 1. Just because you don't hear about it doesn't mean it doesn't happen all the time to less known developers with no public voice. 2. What's his incentive not to take the out Apple offered him? If he was guilty & had no problem lying, why the heck wouldn't he grab the opportunity to be reinstated? The only rational incentive to hold his ground is if he actually believes he is in the right. Which indicates that his story is likely true. I agree that he could just as easily be lying, but the series of events and decisions fit much better with a guy who feels hurt and in the right, versus a guy who has no problem lying and being dishonest publicly. Edit: spelling correction