4 ms·
> Zero doesn't sound like a reasonable expectation. No it does. German documents clearly say "if they try to flee the city - shoot them". Hitler had specific p
by open_bear 10y ago
> Zero doesn't sound like a reasonable expectation.
No it does. German documents clearly say "if they try to flee the city - shoot them". Hitler had specific plans to destroy it completely after the war.
> but not everyone was killed.
Out of 27 million deaths only 8 millions were combatants. Do the math on civilians.
> is whether a timely evacuation of Leningrad
Leningrad is a major industrial and cultural center, second city in the USSR, its loss would've dealt a colossal moral blow to the Soviet people. It also tied a lot of Nazi forces, that could've been used elsewhere (i.e. Stalingrad battle).
> Stalin intentionally left much of the civilian population in the siege.
No he didn't. Siege started in September, only 3 months after Nazis attacked. It is not possible to evacuate 3+ million city in such a short time. 659,000 were evacuated before the siege began, and 30,000 after. Many people didn't want to leave their homes.
> is used for silencing honest, civilized discussion about WW2 history.
No it is not.
- notfromhere 10y agoThey were censored for questioning national myths, not for whitewashing history.
- ptaipale 10y agoThis doesn't look like the start of a useful debate, so I'll just say that Stalin prioritized military and ideological victory over sparing the civilian population of Leningrad. Other leaders in other countries made different choices.