4 ms·
'The people in the national security bureaucracy--hell, even me, even though I'm not a national security bureaucrat and have only read a handful of military his
by camperman 10y ago
'The people in the national security bureaucracy--hell, even me, even though I'm not a national security bureaucrat and have only read a handful of military history books--heard that and thought:
"HOLY SHIT."'
I'm not sure how he's supposed to have his finger on the pulse of the national security bureaucracy when he admits that he's a rank amateur.
Categorizing Trump's remarks from the interview as 'maybe we shouldn't defend NATO' is bollocks. The question from the NYT was this: "If Russia came over the border into Estonia or Latvia, Lithuania, places that Americans don’t think about all that often, would you come to their immediate military aid?"
The answer is here: http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/07/trump-nato/492341/ http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/07/trump-nato/4...
Underlying this rambling nonsense is the assumption that Russia is some sort of world aggressor.
- SideburnsOfDoom 10y ago> Underlying this rambling nonsense is the assumption that Russia is some sort of world aggressor. Are you saying that this assumption would be wrong? Is Russia in no way feeling expansionist at present?
- jpt4 10y agoIf one considers the previous ~200 years of Russian Baltic/Eastern European hegemony to have experienced merely a 25 year interruption, perhaps Russia is feeling revanchist, that dangerous superset of expansionist which fuels the latter with patriotic imperative.
- camperman 10y agoNo it isn't.
- WalterSear 10y agoIt is feeling threatened both by the US's clandestine involvement in the former Soviet states and its attempt to hamstring it's natural gas industry via the proxy war in Syria. It has reason to speak and behave belligerantly.