3 ms·

> skin The problem of fossil UI is not a skin. Why that annoying commit hashes are so big? Do you really read them first? Take a look at github UI: every butto

• wyoung2 10y ago
  > Why that annoying commit hashes are so big? In most places, Fossil shows an abbreviated form of the hash, typically 8-10 characters since Fossil, like Git, will accept any unique prefix of an artifact hash to refer to that artifact. Here is a GitHub commit page: https://github.com/aioutecism/amVim-for-VSCode/commits/master and here is a Fossil timeline page, which serves much the same purpose: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline In the fossil case, the hashes are one character longer, and enclosed in square brackets instead of a roundrect. This is a serious complaint? > Do you really read them first? No, you ignore them completely until you need to refer to one, and then you copy-paste it, just like with Git. > every button and label have meaningful place and polished Which button or label in the default Fossil skin is not in a meaningful place, and which shows a lack of polish? Be specific. > they forgot to hire a designer. I'm pretty sure the differences between the two stem not from forgetfulness but from the fact that GitHub, Inc. employs 608 people, is closed source, and has a revenue model, whereas Fossil is a side project of a company that's probably 1/100 that size and grows mainly by open source user code contributions.