3 ms·
Well, first off, legality in immigration is a cloudy term, meaning it's often tried in immigration courts, of which there are 58 in the entire country [1]. Also
by croon 10y ago
Well, first off, legality in immigration is a cloudy term, meaning it's often tried in immigration courts, of which there are 58 in the entire country [1]. Also notable is that you are not appointed a lawyer in these courts [2]. There are only 250 judges in the country, handling more than 3 times the cases regular judges do [3]. Here's one example of an American being deported: [4].
This is the case right now. Ramping up deportation as Trump has suggested would obviously not yield better results. The immigration courts right now have a backlog of more than half a million cases [5]. I've not even touched stop-and-frisk, religious profiling, etc.
Now, and this part is speculation, this part of history comes to mind: [6]. If it's TLDR, then search for "repatriation".
[1]: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/office-of-the-chief-immigration-judge https://www.justice.gov/eoir/office-of-the-chief-immigration...
[2]: http://naij-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016-01-14-Reuters-Why-are-these-children-representing-themselves-in-court.pdf http://naij-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016-01-14-Re...
[3]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/in-a-crowded-immigration-court-seven-minutes-to-decide-a-familys-future/2014/02/02/518c3e3e-8798-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/in-a-crowded-immigra...
[4]: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/04/29/the-deportation-machine http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/04/29/the-deportation...
[5]: http://trac.syr.edu/whatsnew/email.160915.html http://trac.syr.edu/whatsnew/email.160915.html
[6]: http://www.npr.org/2015/09/10/439114563/americas-forgotten-history-of-mexican-american-repatriation http://www.npr.org/2015/09/10/439114563/americas-forgotten-h...
Edit: Bonus: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trumps-proposal-for-legal-immigration/499061/ http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trumps-p...
- code_sardaukar 10y agoI wonder why it is that your legalese is only applied to people who say that illegal immigration is a bad thing. Lots of people openly say that we should tolerate illegal immigration either for economic or humanitarian reasons, and I've never seen such an argument applied to them.