6 ms·

Good because WaPo is not a reputable source of information.

• mozumder 10y ago
  They're probably the most reputable & unbiased source of information.
  • Natsu 10y ago
    That depends on whether you saw the news about them holding illegal fundraisers or sending all their stories to the DNC for editorial review...
    • tehmaco 10y ago
      Source?
      • Natsu 10y ago
        It's one of the leaked emails: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2699 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2699 This site has a copy with more readable formatting: http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/wikileaks-emails-clinton-bernie-list-directory-photos-most-damaging-worst-rhode-island-delegate-fec-jvf/3/ http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/wikileaks-emails-clinton-berni...
    • ryan_j_naughton 10y ago
      Source please?
      • Natsu 10y ago
        See above.
  • burkaman 10y ago
    How often do you read it? I recently moved to the DC area so the Post is my daily paper, and while I wouldn't read it if wasn't reputable, I don't think anybody can call it unbiased. It's not just the presidential campaign, they have clear, almost plainly stated bias in lots of areas. I'm fine with that, because it's not hidden and it's not so egregious that they report false stories or something, but the Post should not be your only source of news.
  • alphapapa 10y ago
    Are you joking? The Washington Post is one of the most left-leaning, biased papers in the country. They're not even subtle about it. Do you honestly not recognize this?
  • ConfuciusSay02 10y ago
    You should consider a career in comedy.