> "This is the opposite of what it should do" ... "As someone who cycles, and who has over 300 cycling websites" Something about self-serving? I think you only

> "This is the opposite of what it should do" ... "As someone who cycles, and who has over 300 cycling websites" Something about self-serving? I think you only feel that way because you don't drive. Other self-serving people will naturally want something to protect them. Duh. Given what ScottBurson said, though, it's unlikely cars will be stuck in such a tough spot. In my opinion, it should be optional on the passengers' part. Maybe some benevolent individual doesn't mind prioritizing other people's lives over their own. But those who choose to save themselves will end up having to explain, possibly in court, over their decision, rather than it being the car manufacturer who will never have a "correct" answer no matter which option they choose.