2 ms·
The problem with anecdotes in this case is that the libido fluctuates a lot anyway, and a sample size of "1 person" is just not going to tell us much. To the be
by M_Grey 10y ago
The problem with anecdotes in this case is that the libido fluctuates a lot anyway, and a sample size of "1 person" is just not going to tell us much. To the best of anyone's ability to rigorously test though, there are no aphrodisiacs. That should honestly make sense, since if there were any, they would be the subject of intense scrutiny and attempts to synthesize a version you could stick in a pill; it would be a gold mine like no other.
- im3w1l 10y ago> sample size of "1 person" There are a few different problems here which should not be confused with each other. 1. Variance. This is what people normally talk about when they talk about sample size. Maybe thomyorkie just happened to randomly be horny in those specific instances? If they tried it sufficiently many times that would give a high sample size and eliminate variance problems. 2. Blinding / placebo. Maybe believing that they will be horny causes them to be horny. 3. Representativeness. Maybe thomyorkie just works in their own way and the results wont generalize to other people.