4 ms·

Which would you recommend I start with as a newcomer to the low-level debugging world - gdb or lldb? I have some experience debugging assembly in x86 real mode

by Cyph0n 10y ago

Which would you recommend I start with as a newcomer to the low-level debugging world - gdb or lldb? I have some experience debugging assembly in x86 real mode (yep, my class was outdated!).

steveklabnik 10y ago
I personally don't have enough direct experience with lldb to say. I've heard good things. It's on my list of stuff to try out.
pYQAJ6Zm 10y ago
I have little experience with both, but the developers of LLDB have a goal of making more informative error messages. This was successful enough that GDB devs were compelled to mimic this behavior, making their error reporting more accessible. As far as I know, LLDB still has the advantage in this regard.
- badlogic 10y ago
  You must be confusing LLDB/GDB with Clang/GCC. LLDB and GDB are debuggers, they generally do not produce many error messages. Clang has/had better error messages than GCC.
  - pYQAJ6Zm 10y ago
    You are right; I stand corrected.
baldfat 10y ago
> I have some experience debugging assembly in x86 real mode (yep, my class was outdated!). Are you kidding that is an awesome skill to have. Everyone "should" learn assembly and write a small program once.