4 ms·
For me the problem is making stuff secure (..enough, and that would require my "full" attention). That's why I would love if a company like Mozilla, that offer
by oridecon 10y ago
For me the problem is making stuff secure (..enough, and that would require my "full" attention).
That's why I would love if a company like Mozilla, that offers stuff I support like Firefox, started offering a paid "Google suite" with custom domains. Or at least e-mail and storage. I understand most of it is a race to the bottom but it might be viable if it was open source, community driven. What I care about is knowing my data is not being sold and paying for not having to monitor logs, update servers and all of that.
I do use the cloud but only for encrypted tar files.
I do know about alternatives like the ones listed at privacytools.io, but it's all about trust (in before someone tells me why I shouldn't trust Mozilla).
- lucb1e 10y agoOf all the companies, I think Mozilla is one of the best ones these days. I'd not be surprised to hear there has been bad behavior from an employee or some corporate manager, but overall, they still stand for something.
- EGreg 10y agoThis. I have been actively building tools to enable decentralization of social networking and I can tell you that security is the main downside of new, open-source tools you can self-host. What is the solution for young new projects?