5 ms·
Does it share the same weakness at zeroNet - maximum allowed size of a webpage (100MB)?
by akerro 10y ago
Does it share the same weakness at zeroNet - maximum allowed size of a webpage (100MB)?
- ayyn0n0n0 10y agoWhy in the heck would you want a webpage to be 100mb+ ?! I wouldn't say that is a weakness, you want your webpages to be as small as possible.
- bruno2223 10y ago+1
- quirkafleeg 10y agoThere's an up arrow next to usernames.
- akerro 10y ago> Why in the heck would you want a webpage to be 100mb+ ?! Websites have scripts, images, videos, ads, text. Image + thumbnail = 1MB, gallery of images = 15MB, 600 posts with images, thumbnails, comments with avatars = ... ? My wordpress blog started in 2010 with images, thumbnails is 5GB, last time I checked in July.
- ClassyJacket 10y agoBut 100MB per page is ridiculous, expect for embedded videos. I'd be waiting two minutes for each page to load.
- akerro 10y agoIn the top comment by webpage I meant a blog. I wanted to publish my blog on zeroNet, but I can do it only when I remove all images, which misses the point of my blog.
- haggy 10y agoAlso keep in mind that this isn't a traditional Request/Response model. Much (if not all) of a "website" must be downloaded up front via the torrent network, and then run locally. 100MB per request on a traditional site is ridiculous but 100MB for downloading 1 very large web app from the torrent network is not so crazy.
- ayyn0n0n0 10y ago>600 posts with images, thumbnails, comments with avatars = This is not all on ONE page >My wordpress blog started in 2010 with images, thumbnails is 5GB, last time I checked in July. Again, that is the size of your database, not webpage.
- kordless 10y agoGo look in the code and quit asking second thought questions that chew up other's resources.
- almost 10y agoThere's really no need to respond so snappily to simple questions like that. Even if it were unacceptable to ask a question that could be answered by reading the source code (and I think most would say that's fine) it still wouldn't be ok to be so rude.
- kordless 10y agoObservationally, I'm 100% accurate in my statements. Someone asking a question like this has little intent to know the actual answer and raises doubt in those who do not have intent to know the answer. It's a recursive pattern that is wasteful. My karma burning is of little significance compared to unbounded criticism that comes in by way of ignorance. It is wasteful to ask leading questions, and it pollutes the discussion here. HN reacts negatively to "reddit" like comments, so I see little reason why we can't start reacting negatively to people who ask leading questions that are actually veiled blaming statements. It increases the trust of the comments and decreases the extra workloads having to parse people's illogical comments.
- diegorbaquero 10y agoNo, WebTorrent easily handles 500MB+ torrents. (I'm a WebTorrent collaborator)
- thatcat 10y agoThere's no limit on zer0net, if you pull the hovering 0 in the top right corner to the left with your mouse there is a menu where you can set the limit to whatever you want - or if any website wants to use more a dialogue pop up will ask you if you want to reset.