3 ms·
>I think you rarely find the guy with the revolutionary idea and the guy that is the determine hard worker to be the same person. I disagree. The only way to a
by RyanMcGreal 17y ago
>I think you rarely find the guy with the revolutionary idea and the guy that is the determine hard worker to be the same person.
I disagree. The only way to arrive at a workable revolutionary idea is to iterate aggressively until you hit on a model that works.
- chegra84 17y agoAbsolutes... words like only...Successfully Entrepreneurs. Be reasonable and say for some workable revolutionary idea. You'll are creating a dogma about entrepreneurship. It only takes one counter example to brake your false notion of entrepreneurship. Facebook - when it came out was a hit. Google Search - they were good from the start, the interface rarely changed eBay - Unexcepted hit. [The majority of their iteration was done after they were successful] -There is something called luck. For people that arent superstars maybe you are right. All am asking is to be reasonable and say some, not all.
- RyanMcGreal 17y agoYou can't warn credibly against absolutes right after writing a generalization like this: > I think you rarely find the guy with the revolutionary idea and the guy that is the determine hard worker to be the same person. The ideas person is normally a dreamer and likes to change ideas quickly while the determine hard worker is diligent and hates change. These are caricatures that reinforce the false dichotomy between creativity and hard work.
- chegra84 17y agoRarely is not an absolute.Rarely leaves room for outliers, And before rarely, i added i think, making it clear i have no evidence to back this up. Only - is an absolute. You made no effort to indicate it was an opinion but you present it as an absolute truth.
- chegra84 17y agoThe main point of my rely was to go down with certain cliche phrase like 1% and 99%. And with the notion one person builds a company.