3 ms·
I tried out dozens of generators; for plain, simple, mostly text blogs, Hugo is fine. And Pelican, and Jekyll, and nearly all. Hugo falls short when it comes t
by pmlnr 10y ago
I tried out dozens of generators; for plain, simple, mostly text blogs, Hugo is fine. And Pelican, and Jekyll, and nearly all.
Hugo falls short when it comes to custom needs, like EXIF handling, or intermediate image downsizing for responsive images, because adding features to Hugo is painful.
- senorjazz 10y agoIf you want custom features the only option I found is Nikola : get Nikola.com The plugin system let's you do nearly anything you can think of,and if not the devs are will consider updates to make it possible
- guitarbill 10y agoObviously not true; a quick search shows the two options the op mentioned, Jekyll [0] and Pelican [1] have plugins. I'm familiar with Pelican. Apart from writing plugins (with excellent signals to hook into), you can replace the main class with a custom class and get basically any behaviour you want. [0] https://jekyllrb.com/docs/plugins/ https://jekyllrb.com/docs/plugins/ [1] http://docs.getpelican.com/en/3.6.3/plugins.html http://docs.getpelican.com/en/3.6.3/plugins.html
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- angry-hacker 10y agoDo you agree that pelican is the best when it comes to adding features and plugins? I do like Hugo because of the speed and portability.