3 ms·
While this could prevent some of the accidents, I'm not sure if the sum effect would be better. Allow me to explain: According to Google, the average cycling s
by Etheryte 10y ago
While this could prevent some of the accidents, I'm not sure if the sum effect would be better. Allow me to explain:
According to Google, the average cycling speed is 15.5km/h and the average car length is 4.5m. Surely these will differ a lot from area to area, but they're good for a ballpark measure. This means it takes a cyclist about one second (4.5m / 15.5kmh = 1.05s) to pass a parked car.
Even if you have a car with sensors, if the cyclist is out of your sensors' reach (behind the corner of the previous car), once you open your door, that one second will not be enough for the cyclist to either stop or change course.
What might happen, however, is having sensors could lead to more reckless behavior along the lines of "why do I need to look, I have sensors?".
- cerebellum42 10y ago>According to Google, the average cycling speed is 15.5km/h That sounds like a speed averaged over a whole trip - including the phases of deceleration and acceleration before/after traffic lights. From my experience, most people are closer to 17-20km/h when traveling, with plenty of fit people going at 24+.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- carterehsmith 10y ago> enough for the cyclist to either stop or change course I proposed that the car door get blocked, no need for cyclist to do anything.