4 ms·
2 woman... is "multiple woman" now. You want that from dozens of people, he singles out 2 of those people specifically for a job that envolves some kind of exp
by jbmorgado 10y ago
2 woman... is "multiple woman" now.
You want that from dozens of people, he singles out 2 of those people specifically for a job that envolves some kind of expertise, not because they are good at it, but just because they are woman.
I guess this is the "equality" thing I keep hearing about...
- new299 10y agoYes... two is in fact... multiple. There might have been more, we don't know. In this specific case, the event organizer wanted to include women, specifically because they were women. According to the article. He said he couldn't find any, and was actively seeking them. But seems not to have explored the resources available. Honestly this happens a lot. Because event organizers are embarrassed that their panels/events appear to be men only events. But they don't actually care that much, just want to pay lip service to the idea. You can argue that he shouldn't care if they happen to be men only events, but pretending to care makes him disingenuous.