5 ms·

By definition exceptional people are difficult to find or they would not be exceptional. Everyone is not a Torvalds or Carmack. That recognition has come after

by throw2016 10y ago

By definition exceptional people are difficult to find or they would not be exceptional. Everyone is not a Torvalds or Carmack. That recognition has come after decades of exceptional work and experience, not by solving test questions in an interview process. How are you going to find Torvalds or Carmack in an interview process before they have had the opportunity to do all the decades of work and gain the recognition? This 10x fantasy needs to stop or let's see some 10x code. Anyone seeking a 10x engineer needs to ask themselves whether they can afford them and if the work on offer is exceptional enough to require that level of talent.

rhizome 10y ago
Maybe it's so that "x"'s compound over time.
macca321 10y ago
10x code is the code you didn't write because you knew how to solve a problem simply (usually by knowing about the existence of available tools and approaches, instead of building things from scratch),
mdpopescu 10y ago
Watch this talk [1] if you want to see someone transform horrible code into 10x code. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE
overgard 10y ago
I guess I don't get what you're saying. It seems like your argument is that exceptional people are hard to find so we should give up trying? What on earth is 10x code, or the 10x fantasy? I already gave you easy examples of people that are probably 100x more productive than average in terms of impact, so it's not like someone 10x better than average is a unicorn. I'm not trying to be rude, but "10x code not 10x developers" sounds like a delusional platitude you'd hear from a faux populist politician or something. It means practically nothing.
- llukas 10y ago
  So this 10x bullshit you're talking about is about people being leaders. Higher up the ladder you are your power to increase productivity or hamper is multiplied. Comparing impact of regular line developer with leader is comparing apples to oranges. Becoming leader is a different thing - not everybody wants to or have what it takes to do it.
- dilemma 10y ago
  It's very clear to me what the parent is saying. The people you give as example only got that recognition long after doing the work that established their career. In an interview process at the start of their careers this work had not been done and their talent could hardly have been recognized in an interview process. Actually, after reading Masters of Doom I am pretty sure that a 20 year old Carmack or Romero would not get hired at any company in the entire state of California that has an HR team. This due to personality traits, lacking educational pedigree and poor work history.

rhizome 10y ago

Maybe it's so that "x"'s compound over time.

macca321 10y ago

10x code is the code you didn't write because you knew how to solve a problem simply (usually by knowing about the existence of available tools and approaches, instead of building things from scratch),

mdpopescu 10y ago

Watch this talk [1] if you want to see someone transform horrible code into 10x code. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE

overgard 10y ago

I guess I don't get what you're saying. It seems like your argument is that exceptional people are hard to find so we should give up trying? What on earth is 10x code, or the 10x fantasy? I already gave you easy examples of people that are probably 100x more productive than average in terms of impact, so it's not like someone 10x better than average is a unicorn. I'm not trying to be rude, but "10x code not 10x developers" sounds like a delusional platitude you'd hear from a faux populist politician or something. It means practically nothing.

llukas 10y ago
So this 10x bullshit you're talking about is about people being leaders. Higher up the ladder you are your power to increase productivity or hamper is multiplied. Comparing impact of regular line developer with leader is comparing apples to oranges. Becoming leader is a different thing - not everybody wants to or have what it takes to do it.
dilemma 10y ago
It's very clear to me what the parent is saying. The people you give as example only got that recognition long after doing the work that established their career. In an interview process at the start of their careers this work had not been done and their talent could hardly have been recognized in an interview process. Actually, after reading Masters of Doom I am pretty sure that a 20 year old Carmack or Romero would not get hired at any company in the entire state of California that has an HR team. This due to personality traits, lacking educational pedigree and poor work history.