It's probably not the pro-trade stance so much as the spotlight that's on the $26 million she was paid for those speeches. It conveys the impression that she is

It's probably not the pro-trade stance so much as the spotlight that's on the $26 million she was paid for those speeches. It conveys the impression that she is beholden to Wall Street financial interests. It may not damage the Clinton campaign, though, because Trump's womanizing talk came out the same day and is attracting more attention. This election season has a scandal-of-the-week feel to it, and many Americans are looking forward to it being over already.