4 ms·
I don't believe the shareholders committed fraud in purchasing shares, they are punished by the actions of criminals outside of their control. Yet is appears th
by cmdrfred 10y ago
I don't believe the shareholders committed fraud in purchasing shares, they are punished by the actions of criminals outside of their control. Yet is appears the criminals will go free. If you or I committed $100 Million plus in Medicaid fraud, we would most certainly be in prison. Take back the profits from the shareholders, apply civil asset forfeiture proceedings to the executive staffs assets, and put those responsible in prison.
- ch4s3 10y agoCriminal is a harsh word. It looks like the government just finally balked at Mylan abusing their position. But shareholders had every opportunity to know what the prices were, and what the regulatory climate was. My opinion is that if you invest in pharma, you should know how the market works, or else you might get a haircut. Sure, Mylan aren't on any moral high ground, but the operate the way you would expect a rational firm to act in the regulatory environment lawmakers have set up. Blame your congressperson, your senator. If the law allows it, don't expect companies not to do it. And if the law doesn't allow it, but the regulators never drop the hammer, don't expect people not to do it. If the regulators do have the funding to do their job, look to the legislature to find the problem. And if you invest in this kind of business know what you're getting involved in.
- cmdrfred 10y ago>If the law allows it, don't expect companies not to do it. This is outright fraud. The law does not allow it. They purposefully misrepresented their product for financial gain.
- ch4s3 10y ago> And if the law doesn't allow it, but the regulators never drop the hammer, don't expect people not to do it. I'm not saying it isn't fraud. I'm saying that its par for the course when regulators rarely take action. Mylan got greedy and got slapped. Regulatory bodies in the US are woefully underfunded and this sort of thing is the result. Blame congress.
- cmdrfred 10y ago64% of murders currently result in an conviction. At what percentage would it no longer be the perpetrators responsibility for the crime and instead be the fault of the lawmakers lack of ability to bring him to justice?
- ch4s3 10y agoWell, if only a handful ever get investigated because the police are understaffed... well then follow the funding. You get the regulatory environment you vote for.
- jcoffland 10y agoYou can vote one way and get something else. Your logic does not hold.
- colejohnson66 10y agoThat's a straw man (I think)
- forgetsusername 10y agoHow do you know it's a murder if there's no conviction? I'm not sure I understand this Stat.