3 ms·
In a civil case, this has no merit. What they should do is "sue" them using a W3C "court", and if there is no such thing (as I'm pretty sure there is none) it s
by redial 10y ago
In a civil case, this has no merit. What they should do is "sue" them using a W3C "court", and if there is no such thing (as I'm pretty sure there is none) it should be created. If members of W3C don't adhere by the standards set after a lengthy and tiresome process of review, they should be "liable" to the standards body.
This of course is not going to happen because members are the ones funding W3C, and they would just take their money elsewhere and the W3C would be sad.
- stephenr 10y ago> If members of W3C don't adhere by the standards set after a lengthy and tiresome process of review Which standard would that be? Web workers and Webrtc are not standardised. Html5 makes no specification about video codecs. So, what standards exactly are not being adhered to?