4 ms·
Heh, thanks for the explanation, and sorry for apparently ruining your day :) I did suspect that "Garret then claims that this can be used for superluminal com
by ttctciyf 10y ago
Heh, thanks for the explanation, and sorry for apparently ruining your day :)
I did suspect that "Garret then claims that this can be used for superluminal communication" missed that you were using this as a kind of reductio, but I then took it to mean that your reductio was not working how you expected it to. Probably I should re-watch the video - it's been a couple of years.
- lisper 10y agoYou didn't ruin my day, it actually feels good to vent every now and then. :-) > your reductio was not working how you expected it to Actually, it pretty much works exactly how I expected, and has for 25 years (I started down this road in 1990 when the EPRG paradox first occurred to me. It took me ten years to find someone who knew the answer.) The problem is when people look at EPRG out of context and think that my thesis is that I've invented FTL and therefore I am the World's Greatest Physicist. (And now some moron is probably going to cite this very comment and say that I've claimed to be the Worlds Greatest Physicist because they saw that I wrote "... I am the World's Greatest Physicist" and they don't have time to read the part that they elided.)