2 ms·
> "when it failed to scale" Hmm, well I saw it scale great. It is very much useful to me. It hasn't lost a single write in years since I've been using it. Alo
by rdtsc 10y ago
> "when it failed to scale"
Hmm, well I saw it scale great. It is very much useful to me.
It hasn't lost a single write in years since I've been using it. Along with Basho's Riak is probably the only database that has master-to-master replication done right. Has built-in web interface for administration and data viewing.
Ok, I'll bite then, so what's "useful" technology?
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoHere's a (not quite recent) story of somebody abandoning CouchDB when it exceeded one instance: https://blog.hipchat.com/2013/10/16/how-hipchat-scales-to-1-billion-messages/ https://blog.hipchat.com/2013/10/16/how-hipchat-scales-to-1-... So maybe my info is out of date if 2.0 fixes this.
- liveoneggs 10y agodid you read that blog you posted? They still use couchdb and never say they even attempted to use it on multiple instances; just that they ran out of AWS capacity to keep growing their one massive instance. They stopped using the couch-lucene search integration.
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoStopped using couchdb 'to scale'