On your first point; alright, then my mistake. But my comment was really in response to your second line here. I disagreed with your assertion. The alternative

On your first point; alright, then my mistake. But my comment was really in response to your second line here. I disagreed with your assertion. The alternative is that this editor doesn't exist, meaning "no editor at all" with this specific featureset/design/etc. And if this editor is better than a less bloated editor, why shouldn't it exist?