7 ms·
I feel like this takes the term "ruining" too literally. Yes, clearly nothing was completely ruined with each subsequent change, but the current incantation is
by heartsucker 10y ago
I feel like this takes the term "ruining" too literally. Yes, clearly nothing was completely ruined with each subsequent change, but the current incantation is certainly not the same as the first, and people are right to criticize the change (just as people are right to defend it). No one change might have been the death, but all together, it is very understandable that some people might call it "dead" and have moved on.
- ben174 10y agoI think that's the joke.
- heartsucker 10y agoThe post seemed to claim that because each small change didn't ruin it, it's not ruined. I'm saying that it's ruined to some because it's no longer the thing they fell in love with.
- HCIdivision17 10y agoHuh, you know, I've never really noticed it as Xeno's Paradox applied that way before. I'll have to keep an eye out for it, since it can lead to such a different conclusion with the same information.
- lfowles 10y agoZeno's paradox or Ship of Theseus?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- FireBeyond 10y agoThere's a song that has the lyrics, about a drunk Irishman singing of home: "He sings his songs of Ireland far away, and of how he's going back to Dublin one fine day." but carries on: "And the Ireland of his heart's recall, If it ever did exist at all, Now only lives and wistfully moves, Through Paddy's dreams." So many of our memories are very... rose-tinted.
- CamperBob2 10y agoMore of a "You can't step into the same river twice" kind of thing.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]