4 ms·
I run Assembla, but I will say that Github is a good service, and they do a better job with code sharing and individual repositories. Assembla is more oriented
by andysingleton 16y ago
I run Assembla, but I will say that Github is a good service, and they do a better job with code sharing and individual repositories. Assembla is more oriented toward managing teams. This is not a move to go against Github. We still offer Github as a repository tool. You can use Assembla ticketing / collaboration / team management tools, and link them to code commits on github.
- pjhyett 16y agoThanks for the kind words. GitHub does have an organization/teams feature currently in beta and should be released publicly within a month or two.
- icefox 16y agoInteresting, given that GitHub is several years old and has a huge user base there must be something right for GitHub to have not needed a teams feature up until now. Was this a feature that users were asking for or a feature that when watching users they would very much benefit to have?
- pjhyett 16y agoWe just turned two and folks have been asking for team support since before we launched. We've never been in the habit of building features we merely think people want.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]