3 ms·

1) "they are rather expensive" - They are getting cheaper 2) "for tasks that don't require any human brain activity" - Does taking a rubber gel cap from one pla

by jxcole 17y ago

1) "they are rather expensive" - They are getting cheaper 2) "for tasks that don't require any human brain activity" - Does taking a rubber gel cap from one place and sticking into the bottom of a mouse assembly really require brain activity? That is what the star factory worker in this article was doing. 3) "they're not exactly popular amongst manual labourers" - If the point of robots is to get rid of manual laborers, then does it really matter when they are upset? Also, remember, there are no unions in China (so this article claims), so the likelihood of a strike is very minor.

krschultz 17y ago
They are getting cheaper relative to American workers, not 3rd world workers. I did an automation project last fall, the reason was the risk of the current workers sueing over carpal tunnel syndrome. That was more of a driving factor than the cost of salaries (the robot will be paid off in about 5 years, but still, defending 1 suit is more expensive than a robot). The workers in the US cost about 40k, the workers in the article cost 1.5k. The workers in the article have no hope to sue for anything related to repetitive strain injuries. I doubt robots will be taking over chinese factories for a LONG time except where precision beyond human skill is required.
DrJokepu 17y ago
Does taking a rubber gel cap from one place and sticking into the bottom of a mouse assembly really require brain activity? No it's more like things such as disassembling a batch of defective hairdriers, typically low volume things.
foldr 17y ago
>Does taking a rubber gel cap from one place and sticking into the bottom of a mouse assembly really require brain activity? Yes, a ton. Picking something up and putting it in the right location is actually a pretty tough AI problem, in the more difficult cases.
- SapphireSun 17y ago
  you guys are thinking of multi-jointed arms. Simplify! Just make it so that all the things line up within some tolerance as they roll down the line and you're golden. Also, removing manual labor jobs means that there is an available labor pool for something more productive that the robots CAN'T do. Broken glass fallacy anyone?

by jxcole 17y ago

krschultz 17y ago

They are getting cheaper relative to American workers, not 3rd world workers. I did an automation project last fall, the reason was the risk of the current workers sueing over carpal tunnel syndrome. That was more of a driving factor than the cost of salaries (the robot will be paid off in about 5 years, but still, defending 1 suit is more expensive than a robot). The workers in the US cost about 40k, the workers in the article cost 1.5k. The workers in the article have no hope to sue for anything related to repetitive strain injuries. I doubt robots will be taking over chinese factories for a LONG time except where precision beyond human skill is required.

DrJokepu 17y ago

Does taking a rubber gel cap from one place and sticking into the bottom of a mouse assembly really require brain activity? No it's more like things such as disassembling a batch of defective hairdriers, typically low volume things.

foldr 17y ago

>Does taking a rubber gel cap from one place and sticking into the bottom of a mouse assembly really require brain activity? Yes, a ton. Picking something up and putting it in the right location is actually a pretty tough AI problem, in the more difficult cases.

SapphireSun 17y ago
you guys are thinking of multi-jointed arms. Simplify! Just make it so that all the things line up within some tolerance as they roll down the line and you're golden. Also, removing manual labor jobs means that there is an available labor pool for something more productive that the robots CAN'T do. Broken glass fallacy anyone?