4 ms·

It would be interesting to see some speed benchmarks.

hilti 10y ago
Here You go :-) http://www.newlisp.org/index.cgi?page=MergesortBenchmark http://www.newlisp.org/index.cgi?page=MergesortBenchmark
hilti 10y ago
And regarding hardware benchmarks this is fun too, seeing on how many platforms this scripting language is running. (Source: http://www.newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3708 http://www.newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=...) 0.33 ; 2.7GHz Intel Core i5 iMac, 64 bit newLISP 10.3.2 - cormullion\n 0.45 ; 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 MacBook Pro, 64 bit newLISP - itistoday\n 0.5 ; 2.2Ghz AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core Processor 64-bit on Linux IPv4 - pjot\n 0.55 ; Windows XP at AMD Phenom II X2 545, 3 GHz - Cyril \n 0.6 ; 2 x 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon - joe \n 0.63 ; FreeBSD at NFSHOST poss. 2.8 GHZ CPU - lutz\n 0.7 ; FreeBSD at NFSHOST probably the same on a bad day - cormullion 0.71 ; Mac OS X 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 64-bit version of newLISP - cormullion 0.75 ; MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo running 32-bit newLISP - hilti 0.8 ; AMD 64 3200+ - newdep 0.89 ; zLinux (for the IBM mainframe) - jopython 0.9 ; Mac OS X 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 32-bit newLISP- cormullion 1.00 ; Mac OS X 1.83 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - Lutz 1.1 ; Windows Vista 64 at Intel Pentium D 940, 3.2 Ghz. - kazimir 1.36 ; Pentium 4, 2Ghz running Ubuntu 9.04 - robert gorenc 2.24 ; Sun Sparc 1350MHZ processor - jopython 3.25 ; Windows XP at Intel Pentium III, 800 MHz - Cyril 3.40 ; Nokia N900 at 950 MHz - hilti's "numbercruncher" 5.15 ; Nokia N900 at 700 MHz 5.37 ; Raspberry Pi 900 mHz (overclocked with the raspi-config tool) - Hilti 5.44 ; Mac OS X 1GHz PowerPC G4 (eMac) - cormullion 6.72 ; Raspberry Pi 700 mHz 256 MB RAM - Hilti 9.52 ; Sun Sparc Ultra-2 - lutz 13.7 ; Nokia N810 armv61 - newdep 30.64 ; Pentium 90, running DamnSmallLinux - robert gorenc 50.0 ; Intel Pentium 120 - P54CQS - 120MHz - xytroxon
criddell 10y ago
Speed of development or speed of execution? :) I don't think anybody anywhere has ever chosen a Lisp language because it's fast.
- cestith 10y ago
  Actually I know of a couple projects that have played with using CL as an intermediate language because of the performance they got compiling with SBCL.
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago
  Some of the CL and Scheme compilers are pretty fast, especially compared to similar languages.

hilti 10y ago

Here You go :-) http://www.newlisp.org/index.cgi?page=MergesortBenchmark http://www.newlisp.org/index.cgi?page=MergesortBenchmark

hilti 10y ago

And regarding hardware benchmarks this is fun too, seeing on how many platforms this scripting language is running. (Source: http://www.newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3708 http://www.newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=...) 0.33 ; 2.7GHz Intel Core i5 iMac, 64 bit newLISP 10.3.2 - cormullion\n 0.45 ; 2.4GHz Intel Core i5 MacBook Pro, 64 bit newLISP - itistoday\n 0.5 ; 2.2Ghz AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core Processor 64-bit on Linux IPv4 - pjot\n 0.55 ; Windows XP at AMD Phenom II X2 545, 3 GHz - Cyril \n 0.6 ; 2 x 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon - joe \n 0.63 ; FreeBSD at NFSHOST poss. 2.8 GHZ CPU - lutz\n 0.7 ; FreeBSD at NFSHOST probably the same on a bad day - cormullion 0.71 ; Mac OS X 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 64-bit version of newLISP - cormullion 0.75 ; MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo running 32-bit newLISP - hilti 0.8 ; AMD 64 3200+ - newdep 0.89 ; zLinux (for the IBM mainframe) - jopython 0.9 ; Mac OS X 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 32-bit newLISP- cormullion 1.00 ; Mac OS X 1.83 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - Lutz 1.1 ; Windows Vista 64 at Intel Pentium D 940, 3.2 Ghz. - kazimir 1.36 ; Pentium 4, 2Ghz running Ubuntu 9.04 - robert gorenc 2.24 ; Sun Sparc 1350MHZ processor - jopython 3.25 ; Windows XP at Intel Pentium III, 800 MHz - Cyril 3.40 ; Nokia N900 at 950 MHz - hilti's "numbercruncher" 5.15 ; Nokia N900 at 700 MHz 5.37 ; Raspberry Pi 900 mHz (overclocked with the raspi-config tool) - Hilti 5.44 ; Mac OS X 1GHz PowerPC G4 (eMac) - cormullion 6.72 ; Raspberry Pi 700 mHz 256 MB RAM - Hilti 9.52 ; Sun Sparc Ultra-2 - lutz 13.7 ; Nokia N810 armv61 - newdep 30.64 ; Pentium 90, running DamnSmallLinux - robert gorenc 50.0 ; Intel Pentium 120 - P54CQS - 120MHz - xytroxon

criddell 10y ago

Speed of development or speed of execution? :) I don't think anybody anywhere has ever chosen a Lisp language because it's fast.

cestith 10y ago
Actually I know of a couple projects that have played with using CL as an intermediate language because of the performance they got compiling with SBCL.
qwertyuiop924 10y ago
Some of the CL and Scheme compilers are pretty fast, especially compared to similar languages.