3 ms·
> Why is it that in such cases, the government reaches for the CEO right away; War on sex is new War on Drugs. By going after the CEO they are setting a preced
by tn13 10y ago
> Why is it that in such cases, the government reaches for the CEO right away;
War on sex is new War on Drugs. By going after the CEO they are setting a precedent. They want to make sure no investor would invest into something that challenges government authority.
Wells Fargo CEO will not be touched for the same reason why big banks get bailouts, Hillary clinton is not in jail and Obama is still a president despite killing thousands of innocent people around earth. They are too close to powers.
- GVIrish 10y ago> Hillary clinton is not in jail Ugh not this again. Hillary is not in jail because her actions did not rise to the level of criminal prosecution. Look at General Petraeus. He willfully gave highly classified material to his mistress. He got a plea deal and didn't serve any time. So how is it that Clinton who did not intentionally divulge classified material nor put an authorized server on the classified network, now deserves to be punished more harshly than Petraeus? That doesn't make any sense.
- tn13 10y agoYou can be a Hillary apologist for the sake of political arguments. The thing is if I had done the exact same thing I would be termed a traitor and put in jail.
- 1024core 10y ago> and Obama is still a president despite killing thousands of innocent people around earth. Why not Bush? He's the fucking moron who started it all because he had daddy issues, and killed way more innocents ( > 300,000 ) than Obama??
- tn13 10y agoObama is just an mechanism. In case of Iraq war I think Bush and a large part of his administration must be jailed.