> If an excellent candidate doesn't get an offer, it's probable that something went wrong in the interview process Google sees about half of their employees co

> If an excellent candidate doesn't get an offer, it's probable that something went wrong in the interview process Google sees about half of their employees come from at least a second interview attempt, implying that qualified people fail at least 1/2 the time. Maybe you're claiming that their process is terrible? Or that most companies are significantly better at hiring than them? As the only data point I can find, though, it seems pretty damning. > And if there are only three examples of rejections It's unclear to me why only rejections count. 7 for 7 is a lot more concerning than 3 for 3. FTR, out of the 6 interview processes I've gone through I can think of 2 that don't correlate in this way (one in each direction). So I think I have some basis for suspicion.