3 ms·
Traditionally, I think of Opera as the browser not afraid to be truly standards compliant, even if it means little differences between FF/Safari. I have seen ex
by powrtoch 17y ago
Traditionally, I think of Opera as the browser not afraid to be truly standards compliant, even if it means little differences between FF/Safari. I have seen examples of this, sorry that I can't find them now. Personally I'm happy to have Opera in this role, because I think it's an important role.
If something does need to be fixed "for Opera", it's generally only a tiny CSS change, as opposed to the kinds of structural overhauls IE will make you wrestle with.
In short, in the name of standards, I think it would be nice if FF etc did things exactly the same as Opera :)
- axod 17y agoCan opera even do things like border-radius yet?
- jarek 17y agoYes, as of version 10.50: http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/1050/ http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/1050/
- billybob 17y agoThis isn't about Opera, but just backing up the "renders different != non-compliant" thought - I just fixed a rendering bug in one of my pages that only showed up in Google Chrome. It turned out that Chrome was behaving correctly and that Firefox and IE were not. When I fixed the CSS rule, they were all happy. Sometimes the one who is different is the most correct. Maybe if you satisfy Opera first, you won't have as many problems with the others.